AviRob AviRob
Connect Request Pilot

Deployment Readiness Pilot

Run a governed verification pilot on real site signals.

Use one pilot to prove how AviRob turns PLC/OPC data, VDA/FMS streams, folders, ugly text logs, MCAP, rosbag, CSV, and vendor exports into governed verification truth after your requirements already exist.

  • Governed mapping from messy signals into auditable meaning
  • Dependency-gated verdicts with clear NOT_VERIFIABLE gaps
  • Recurring revalidation and drift visibility after site or config change
After risk assessment On-prem capable NDA-first Works with anonymized source bundles No production access needed

What you get from a pilot

Step 1

You send representative source bundles

Share 1-3 examples from PLC/OPC, VDA/FMS, MCAP, rosbag, CSV, folders, text logs, or vendor exports.

Step 2

We inspect, map, and govern meaning

Bits, registers, codes, aliases, and partial identities are mapped into reviewable, versioned verification meaning.

Step 3

You get one governed review package

Use evidence, coverage, mapping decisions, and next-step guidance across FAT/SAT, handoff, and revalidation.

What source families work

Source A

Controller and PLC data

PLC tags, OPC data, controller snapshots, and safety-relevant state context.

Source B

Fleet and orchestration streams

VDA/FMS events, mission context, zone transitions, and multi-robot coordination signals.

Source C

Files, logs, and exports

MCAP, rosbag, CSV, text logs, folders, and vendor export bundles from the systems you already run.

Source D

Messy industrial identifiers

Bits, registers, code tables, aliases, and partial IDs that need review before they can be trusted.

Where AviRob sits in the lifecycle

Boundary 1

After risk assessment

AviRob starts once the risk assessment, review criteria, and safety intent already exist.

Boundary 2

Not the safety concept author

AviRob does not define the original safety function or replace your certifier or assessor process.

Boundary 3

Dependency-gated verification

PASS or FAIL is allowed only when explicit dependencies are satisfied. Missing proof stays NOT_VERIFIABLE.

Boundary 4

Maintain-phase support

The same lane supports recurring revalidation after robot, site, config, or process change.

Who this pilot is for

Auto-rotating audience segments

What we need from you

  • Representative source bundles from 1-3 scenarios, not just a polished sample run
  • Any tag lists, code legends, zone maps, or register meanings you already have
  • Fleet, vendor, deployment, and change-management context
  • Whether the site is on-prem, isolated, or export/import driven
  • The first review question you want answered

Example review snapshots

AviRob rotating review screenshots

Short demo

FAQ

Do you define the risk assessment or safety concept?

No. AviRob starts after those are already defined and helps verify evidence against existing requirements and review intent.

Can this start from PLC/OPC, VDA/FMS, or ugly vendor data?

Yes. AviRob is designed to start from mixed industrial source families, not only clean robot logs.

Is this only for FAT/SAT?

No. FAT/SAT is an entry point, but the same lane supports periodic testing and recurring revalidation after change.

Can this run on-prem or in isolated environments?

Yes. AviRob supports installed deployment patterns for environments where industrial data needs to stay local.

Can we discuss under NDA?

Yes. NDA-first pilot discussions are supported.